Luminary Research Archive
Luminary Research ArchiveIndependent scholarship
Luminary Portal

Sharp output ranges and bias frontiers for stabilizer purity estimation

Original PDF · First-page preview

Loading original first page…

Abstract

We determine the exact tradeoff between uniform expectation bias and the upper output endpoint for projected-purity estimation by odd-prime stabilizer protocols using at most two identical input copies. If an isotropic Weyl subgroup leaves logical dimension d, the least upper endpoint at bias tolerance ε is max{d−(2d+1)ε,1−ε} for d>1, and 1-ε for d=1. An explicit common-basis collision statistic attains every branch. In particular, the optimal bias with outputs in [0,1] is (d-1)/(2d+1). The proof combines the two-copy Clifford commutant with positive responses at a nonphysical Wigner phase point. The same response argument gives the sharp upper endpoint d for exactly unbiased estimation at every finite copy cap. At larger caps we derive a continuum of Chebyshev witness bounds, an improved finite-cap constant, and the exact leading asymptotic and maximizing location within this witness family. A matching polynomial extremizer on the whole density-matrix body identifies the role of operational symmetry in the exact two-copy result.

Read the full paper in the original PDF.

Edition files

Available editions

  1. Edition 2 · 2026-11-02 · public
  2. Edition 1 · 2026-10-27 · public

Research details

Subjects
Mathematics · Quantum Information Theory
Keywords
Manuscript date
2026-10-27
Reader reuse
none

Scope

We determine the exact tradeoff between uniform expectation bias and the upper output endpoint for projected-purity estimation by odd-prime stabilizer protocols using at most two identical input copies.

Disclosures

OpenAI Codex assisted with exploration, proof checking, code, literature comparison and manuscript preparation. The author takes responsibility for the mathematics and accompanying files.

Reproduction

Complete searchable manuscript and 10-member source package with editable sources and necessary reader-facing verification material. Build instructions and computational scope are stated in the package; proofs are given in the manuscript.

References and related resources

  1. D. Gross. Hudson’s theorem for finite-dimensional quantum systems. Journal of Mathematical Physics 47 (2006), 122107.
  2. V. Veitch, C. Ferrie, D. Gross and J. Emerson. Negative quasi-probability as a resource for quantum computation. New Journal of Physics 14 (2012), 113011.
  3. D. Gross, K. Audenaert and J. Eisert. Evenly distributed unitaries: on the structure of unitary designs. Journal of Mathematical Physics 48 (2007), 052104.
  4. J. Lee and C. Wadhwa. Optimal purity estimation with incoherent measurements (2026).
  5. Z. Cai, A. Chapman, H. Jnane and B. Koczor. Biased estimator channels for classical shadows. Physical Review A 111 (2025), L030402.
  6. R. Takagi, S. Endo, S. Minagawa and M. Gu. Fundamental limits of quantum error mitigation. npj Quantum Information 8 (2022), 114.
  7. L. Bos. A characterization of optimal prediction measures via ℓ1 minimization (2023).
  8. S. Schubr. Mixed-state escape bounds and proper agnostic learning of stabilizer states in odd-prime dimensions. Luminary Research Archive, edition 3 (2026).