Luminary Research Archive
Luminary Research ArchiveIndependent scholarship
Luminary Portal

Covariance confidence bounds and parity certificates for stable count laws

Original PDF · First-page preview

Loading original first page…

Abstract

We construct an upper confidence bound for the operator norm of the normalized covariance deficit of a homogeneous real-stable count law on m categories with total count k, without knowing the mean or imposing a minimum category-probability assumption. This deficit is a rescaling of an established canonical dependence matrix for two balls drawn without replacement. Its positive semidefiniteness gives a diagonal domination property that controls rare categories and normalization error. Independent batches of full count observations suffice: the mean stage uses O(m(k-1)ε⁻² log(m/δ)/k) observations and the second stage uses O(m(k−1)²ε⁻² log(m/δ)). A stable degree-two subclass gives a matching linear category and inverse-square accuracy lower bound up to logarithms. Real-rooted one-dimensional projections turn a covariance bound and a reference Fourier margin into simultaneous positive-parity certificates. A classical sharp product inequality improves their quantitative floor and identifies feasible binary equality cases. We give a sharp positivity boundary on a binary subclass and stable laws with identical means and covariance but opposite parity. The constants in the confidence bound are conservative, and the observation model is classical labeled counts.

Read the full paper in the original PDF.

Edition files

Available editions

  1. Edition 3 · 2026-11-02 · public
  2. Edition 2 · 2026-10-27 · public
  3. Edition 1 · 2026-10-24 · public

Research details

Subjects
Mathematics · Probability and Statistics
Keywords
stable count laws, covariance estimation, rare categories, confidence bounds, parity certificates
Manuscript date
2026-10-23
Reader reuse
none

Scope

We construct an upper confidence bound for the operator norm of the normalized covariance deficit of a homogeneous real-stable count law on m categories with total count k, without knowing the mean or imposing a minimum category-probability assumption.

Disclosures

Generative AI tools, including OpenAI Codex, assisted with mathematical exploration, literature searches, proof checking, verification code and manuscript preparation. The author takes responsibility for the mathematical claims, computations and references.

Reproduction

Complete searchable manuscript and 11-member source package with editable sources and necessary reader-facing verification material. Build instructions and computational scope are stated in the package; proofs are given in the manuscript.

References and related resources

  1. S.-L. Huang, A. Makur, G. W. Wornell and L. Zheng. Universal features for high-dimensional learning and inference. Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory 21(1-2) (2024), 1-299. Section 6.2 and Proposition 6.7.
  2. X. Xu, W. Wang and S.-L. Huang. On the sample complexity of estimating small singular modes. ISIT 2020.
  3. N. Anari, K. Liu, S. Oveis Gharan and C. Vinzant. Log-Concave Polynomials II: High-Dimensional Walks and an FPRAS for Counting Bases of a Matroid. STOC 2019; arXiv:1811.01816v3.
  4. C. M. Le, E. Levina and R. Vershynin. Concentration and regularization of random graphs. Random Structures and Algorithms 51 (2017), 538-561.
  5. I. Diakonikolas, D. M. Kane and A. Stewart. The Fourier transform of Poisson multinomial distributions and its algorithmic applications. arXiv:1511.03592v2 (2016).
  6. J. Borcea, P. Brändén and T. M. Liggett. Negative dependence and the geometry of polynomials. Journal of the American Mathematical Society 22 (2009), 521-567.
  7. S. Schubr. Moment certificates for homogeneous stable count laws. Luminary Research Archive, edition 6 (2026).
  8. J. A. Tropp. User-friendly tail bounds for sums of random matrices. Foundations of Computational Mathematics 12 (2012), 389-434.
  9. P. A. Samuelson. How deviant can you be? Journal of the American Statistical Association 63 (1968), 1522-1525.
  10. W. Tang and F. Tang. The Poisson binomial distribution: old and new. Statistical Science 38 (2023), 108-119.